Sunday, December 2, 2018

My thoughts on book reviews


Writing a review for a book is not the same thing as writing a review for a toaster. A toaster either meets your expectations of toasting bread or it doesn't. But it's a whole other story (pun intended) and there's so much more to take into consideration when you write a review for a book you've read.

As a reader, I will never write a book review unless I believe it deserves four or five stars because, as a writer, I know what it takes to write a book, to see it through from an idea to a published novel.  Months, sometimes even years, researching, developing the characters and the plot, writing, rewriting, editing. . . . The list goes on and on.

And, just because I didn’t like a book, does that mean it isn’t a good book? No! We all have different reading tastes, which means we have different opinions. And those opinions can affect a book’s sales because many readers rely on reviews when deciding whether or not to buy a book.

In most cases, the title, genre and cover are what draw me to a book. I read the synopsis and, if it sounds like a book I’d enjoy, I read it. If not, I don’t. I don’t read the reviews because I don't want to be influenced by what others have written; I prefer to make my own decision about whether or not to read it.

The same goes for recommendations. If another author and/or a friend suggests I read a book, I'll consider it but only after checking out the book for myself. My reading time is precious to me and, if I can’t “get into” a book after giving it a fair chance – several chapters, I put it aside and read something else. I don’t write a scathing review, telling other readers how terrible the book is. That’s not my job; after all, I’m not the reading police.

When my first Malone mystery was published, my publisher decided to do a giveaway on amazon. Lots of people downloaded Mixed Messages and several of them wrote reviews. Some, only a few hours after the book went up for free. How could they possibly have read an almost 80,000 word novel that fast? Well, judging from the fact that a few of those reviewers couldn’t construct a basic sentence nor could they spell, I’m assuming they didn’t. As a newly published author, I was at first devastated because those one and two star reviews significantly affected my review average.

But time went by and, thanks to many wonderful reviews, it all worked out. And, I noticed something interesting. Most of the big name authors get those same kinds of negative reviews. I guess there are just some people out there who, for whatever reason, take pleasure in raining on someone else’s parade. I think that's pathetic and sad.

Like all authors, I LOVE to get positive reviews for my books and I appreciate each and every one of them because, as I mentioned, there are lots of readers out there who rely on reviews to decide whether or not to buy a book. And, of course, I really, really want to reach as many of them as possible.

I’ve given my opinion on book reviews and I would love to hear your thoughts. Happy reading!

8 comments:

  1. Excellent post, Pat! I want to know if readers enjoy my books, and often a review is the only way I know. It doesn't need to be a lengthy review, and it shouldn't give the story away. Like you, I don't always read reviews, but if I'm not sure about a book, a review helps me make up my mind. Those are a few of my thoughts. Thank you for tackling this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And thank you for commenting, Marja. You made an excellent point: a review can be as short as a sentence or two, describing what the reader enjoyed most about the book. I think there are a lot of readers who don't post reviews because they look at a review as a book report. It isn't.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you've just about said it all on the subject of reviews. I totally agree with you about only writing a 4 or 5 star review. If I can't, I just won't write one. However, I do read them to get an idea if I'd like a book. But if a reviewer can't construct a basic sentence or spell, I'll usually overlook the review if they gave it one or two stars.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You're a smart lady, Evelyn. I hope all readers are smart enough to ignore bogus 1 and 2 star reviews - for everyone's books.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Excellent post, Patricia! Nothing to add. Personally, I love getting good review (ego and heart are thrilled) and I only review books I like--enough negativity in the world already, don't need my two-cents added to it. I've loved all your books I've read! Thank you, by the way, for all the wonderful reviews you've given me over the years. Have made my writing heart sing!! Write on!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Madeline! I love your books and I believe in giving credit where credit is due. :)

      Delete
  6. You're quite right. There is a lot to consider when writing a review. I think the most important thing to consider is the genre. If the book is a murder mystery, I will leave a review regardless of whether I love or hate it. I write whodunits, so I think it's fair to give my opinion. If it isn't in my genre, I won't leave a negative review. I feel as if I might be complaining about the very elements that fans enjoy. One example - I like sci-fi, but I'm not really interested in the technology aspect. However, many sci-fi readers fawn over the tech stuff. I would never leave a bad review complaining about too many boring descriptions about the spaceships. The reviewer should understand the expectations of the genre he/she is reading.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point, James! Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us.

      Delete